Winter near Athens, Georgia is mild compared to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania or Cleveland, Ohio. It is mild compared to Easton, Maryland and even milder than New Hope, North Carolina. All of these are places where we’ve lived. Mild is relative.
Practicing archery in cold temperatures is more of a challenge than during the warmer months. Practicing with a compound bow is less of a challenge compared to an Olympic recurve. The issue comes down to strings and fingers.
Wearing additional apparel to practice with a compound bow isn’t too great of a problem. The same amount of clothing needed to stay warm shooting an Olympic recurve (recurve) changes things. That is because the angle of the string isn’t the same for the two bows.
The compound bow is often shorter and the string angle is more acute than a recurve. This means the string rarely has interference from clothing. The recurve has less of an angle and can touch clothing when bundled on for warmth. Warm clothing is often ‘puffy’ and can interfere with the recurve string.
Obviously, an arm guard helps as do chest protectors help with a recurve. I use both during winter months. Still, I can’t wear a nice down filled vest – it is simply too ‘puffy.’ I had a perfect one for winter training while shooting a compound bow.
I do my best to stay warm while shooting outdoors. I also shoot several days a week at a local range, at the ACE Hardware in Social Circle, Georgia. I buy the monthly range pass and get there 4 to 5 times a week in the morning. (The ACE range is closed on Sunday and Monday) In the afternoon when it warms up I practice on my range rather than making the hour round trip back to Social Circle.
In order to shoot okay during the colder afternoons I try to find a balance of apparel for warmth and apparel that won’t hang up in my bow string. The result is I stay cold even with an outdoor propane heater nearby.
The heater helps. I shoot, stand next to the heater, go pull arrows, return to the distance for shooting, stand next to the heater then repeat the process. I make sure I am standing a bit away from the heater while shooting. There’s no gain in melting the fletching on arrows or catching myself of fire.
Granted the winter here in Georgia is mild compared to winter in Cleveland. But, two long t-shirts and a thin vest don’t do a lot for thermal regulatory support. Fortunately, I typically burn a bit hot and am able to get through training in the winter without a whole lot of archery burdensome clothing. Still when the temperature is in the 30s it is cold out there. That is when finger tips start to sting on release of the string.
Last winter the skin on my right ring finger split open while practicing. It took a while to heal and would bleed every time I practiced. So far the callouses on my finger tips are holding solid.
If you have read this blog a few times you might have looked over an article about fitness. Before I ever touched a bow I was an endurance athlete. I swam, raced bicycles and ran long distanced. I was pretty good at it.
I still run and ride bikes nearly every day. Competition is exclusively through archery. I still read a lot about sports science and toss out a manuscript every once in a while in sports science.
Among the academic endeavors as well as professional credentials I was fairly fluent in cardiopulmonary sciences across a broad spectrum. There were often wonderful overlaps in health in fitness that related to a continuum of well-being. Since I athletic and academically suited I spent a portion of my career studying endurance athletes.
I still read peer-review and well as lay articles associated with human endurance performance. Every so often I come across an article that fires me up. Some of them are so good I can’t believe it and at times some miss the mark in the opposite direction.
In the Runner’s World, Volume 57, number 1 on page 34 Christine Byrne’s article The Dangerous Lie of the Perfect Running Weight is published. She is promoting running in at least two cases here of morbid obesity. She suggests tossing out the bathroom scale. There are problems with this approach to running and health.
A perfect running weight is more or less an ideal weight. Perfection is hard to establish for runners. There are many variables where perfection isn’t something we can achieve as runners. However, we do have ideal weights based on our body mass index, distance for a run, muscle tissue components and other biophysical factors. I am not considering VO2(max). Not all runners have super VO2(max) but all runners have a VO2(max).
I am recommending the scale is a good tool. It is a simple device that measures weight. It allows easy monitoring. For overweight individuals weight loss is good. Running while overweight, particularly where morbid obesity exists isn’t a perfect place to begin in order to improve health and fitness.
A weakness in the ‘run off fat’ approach is joint damage. Primary targets for injury are the knees. It may be safer to begin a running program by initially using a weight management program in addition to cycling, swimming (or other pool exercise program), or walking.
Actually, the marathon times of two of the representative runners in Byrne’s article indicates they walked 26.2 miles at moderate to brisk paces. It is easy to see how many people would consider their achievements motivational. Even so, they risked structural injury.
Obesity isn’t healthy. The weight these people are carrying wasn’t gained overnight and won’t be lost overnight. But, carrying a lot of extra weight means adding a huge burden on the body. There are sound methods for reducing weight and finding ways to eventually add running to an overall health and fitness managed lifestyle. Keeping a scale handy isn’t a bad idea.
Think about a person you consider an athletic champion. Which words or phrases would you choose to describe that person? Strong? Energized? Relentless? Balanced? Ambitious? Some, or even all, of those words might apply. And there are certainly many more words that describe it valiantly.
It’s a hot topic that is discussed pervasively. All you need to do is an internet search and a plethora of information pops up. In fact, books have been written about what it takes to be a successful athletic champion. And there is a professional speaking circuit for those willing to pay to listen.
The topic is also arguably subjective. But are there commonalities that simplify the definition of what it takes to be a champion athlete? Perhaps.
Recently, over chicken wings and few bottles of good beer, three professional coaches, one of whom is also a competitive athlete, took the dive into discussing this highly debated topic.
Two of the coaches agreed that the mental aspect, regardless of the sport, is the number one factor in becoming a champion. The premise of the mental aspect is that with enough mental focus and a mental program, an individual can become a champion in his or her chosen sport.
Ordering another round of beers and snatching the last chicken wing in the basket, one of the coaches pushed back. Fundamentally believing that it is the athletic skill itself that is the number one aspect of being a champion, he argued that the mental bit, while essential, is secondary to core physical skill. In other words, he argued that an athlete can think about winning all day and all night, but if the work isn’t there the athlete will fail.
After getting to a point where the coaches were rehashing hash on the topic, and because of commitments like needing to go home to feed the dog and getting itchy to jump on the elliptical and burn off the calories from the beer and chicken wings, the three coaches abandoned the debate. So they could reconvene to discuss, one coach volunteered to develop a simple survey to uncover what it is that turns athlete into a champion.
The coaches agreed, that to give context to the survey, a champion would be defined as an individual who wins a major sporting event, unchallenged as the victor. For example, an athlete who wins an Ironman World Championship, a Gold Medal in an Olympic or Pan Am game, a National title or Professional Golf Association win would meet the criteria.
Through Facebook, a message was sent to recruit responses from 100 athletes and coaches. The same message was sent to everyone:
“I am asking 100 coaches and athletes a question where the responses will be compiled into a database. I will write an essay based on the results. I would greatly appreciate your brief responses. By brief, I mean your top three or four words that describe the answer. The question is: What does it take to be a champion?”
It was not anticipated that Facebook would block progress. A firm notification was returned from the Facebook team believing the messages were coming from a robot. While applause to Facebook for its vigilance to protect its customers is due, the interruption knocked back the messages sent from 100 to 54. Still, 54 was an excellent sample set for an informal study and the coach was thrilled with a 100% response rate from the 54 who received the question..
There were 41 males and 13 females who responded from across the globe: United States, Canada, Spain, Italy, Sweden, Israel, France, England, Australia, Russia, Iran and Switzerland.
To make the survey information robust, the profiles of the respondents were captured.
Twelve sport disciplines were represented: golf, cycling, archery, running/marathon/ultramarathon (distance runners), football, shooting, swimming, triathlon, weightlifting, sailing, track/field (sprint, decathlon, heptathlon) and Karate.
Of the 54 total responders, there were 23 world championships, two Olympic gold medals and four PGA wins. And among the entire group of 54, there were 75 National titles. Included in the 54 were eight athletes who consider themselves enthusiasts, but train for their sport nearly every day and compete on a regular basis. Clearly, this was experience talking.
This was a solid cross section of people who could help define what it takes to be a champion athlete, and so began the arduous task of compiling and analyzing the response and profile data.
Feedback from the respondents resulted in a tally of 132 unique words and descriptors of what it takes to be a champion. All words and descriptors were entered in a spreadsheet and sorted alphabetically. From there, common words and descriptors began to emerge: work, confidence, determination, mental, emotional.
The words were then ranked based on the percentage of response between the athletes and coaches surveyed. Two sets of interesting and potentially conflicting results were revealed:
Athletes used the word “determination” the highest, followed in order by “work”, “emotional”, “mental”, and “confidence” to describe what it takes to be a champion.
In highest place for coaches were words in the “emotional” category, followed by “determination” and “work” being equal, then “confidence” and “mental” respectively. Disciplines for the responding coaches included football (NCAA Div. II, SAC), track and field, triathlon, marathon running, cross country running and archery.
So, what is “the” number one word to describe what it takes to be a champion athlete? Determination, as presented by the athlete survey responses, or emotional, as presented by the coach survey responses?
The trio of coaches reconvened at the pub to discuss the results. Additional questions were posited. Is determination an emotion? Does emotion evoke determination? It could be argued that determination is a mental state that drives emotions like passion and commitment. An athlete can be physically extraordinary at his or her sport, but if there is no passion for the activity, what is the likelihood that individual will emerge as a champion?
Two of three coaches argued that the brain is a powerful thing and it can trick the body into elite performance. One coach felt that when aggressive coaching is involved, the athlete’s mind can push the body into performing at an elite level.
Chicken wings were ordered and the survey results were studied in more depth. Thankfully the wings were served with a big pile of napkins, because the coaches needed to sketch out their theories on how the words garnered from the survey fundamentally aligned to what it takes to be a champion.
Ultimately, the trio agreed that based on the feedback from the 54 person survey, the first and most dominant factor in becoming a champion is determination.If an athlete is determined enough they’ll find a way to get the work done, to build confidence, control and use emotions, and develop a mental process to polish off perfection.
“Work”, as one of the top three words selected by both athletes and coaches, is highly relevant. Following “determination”, all 54 respondents indicated that “work” was the second word to answer the question ‘what does it take to be a champion’, followed in frequency of response by mental effort, emotional bearingand confidence, in that order.
There were two outlier responses, that have merit and are worthy of mentioning. These were: “being in the right place at the right time”and “great equipment.”
The first, ‘right place/right time’, can be considered luck or happen stance. For example, if an undefeated champion is unable to compete one year, does that mean that the new champion for that year is a superior athlete? What if in the following year the original undefeated athlete competes again and takes back the title? There is no way to know. An athlete can only compete against those who show up.
The second outlier response, ‘great equipment’ can surely play a role when an athlete reaches an elite level and marginal gains become more important. For the less aggressive or less accomplished athlete, great equipment, (i.e. expensive equipment), typically isn’t going to impact results as much as more training and practice.
As the last of the people in the pub began to leave, the trio of coaches decided to pay up and came to a somewhat conclusive agreement that determination and work, whether driven by emotion and/or great coaching, were the keys to becoming a champion. Do you agree?
A fellow I know posted on his Facebook page, “Who’s Ready for some 3D?”
He’d purchased his annual new bow and new arrows. He signed with an archery equipment company as a “Pro Staff” member and made a public, Facebook, announcement of his elevated status. He’d posted a competitive schedule and pointed out he’d be traveling to compete on a specific tour. He is a top dog.
Shortly afterward he showed up at the local indoor range and exclaimed excitedly his eagerness for upcoming 3D season to everyone within hearing distance. He’s loud so the audible parameter was large.
While standing at the 18-meter line of the range someone took a smart phone picture of him for Facebook application. Within hours of his departure that photo would land on Facebook with a caption announcing his newly acquired gear was launching arrows to perfection.
While on the range his new bow and arrows in hand he began flinging arrows 18 meters down range. He’s chosen a vertical three spot to destroy. He was wearing out the eight rings.
After thirty minutes he’d shot about 24 arrows. (6 ends of 3 arrows) He collected his shinny gear and departed the range. Eager to post about his superior equipment.
Mr. “Who’s Ready for some 3D?” isn’t really a top dog. In fact, I don’t recall him winning any of the local 3D events. He spends a lot of money at the shop and the workers there treat him like royalty.
Pro Staff doesn’t mean professional archer. Mr. “Who’s Ready for some 3D,” is a perfect example. He wears a pro staff shirt but is far from a professional level archer. The archery shop is allocated a number of positions to fill with local archers as promotional marketing plan for the manufacturer’s gear. The shop selects archers that are loyal, spend money and will promote the shop to complete those “Pro Staff” allocations. Mr. “Who’s Ready for some 3D?” is well liked spends an abundance of money at the shop and wins an allocation. Don’t be fooled, Mr. “Who’s Ready for some 3D?” isn’t a pro. If you paid for your manufacturer’s kit and gear neither are you.
To be a true top dog it takes a lot of commitment. Practice is a focal point in your life. Training is always ongoing. A hundred arrows per week won’t cut it. Practicing on the weekends won’t work. Do the work and win. Then, the manufactures will come looking for you.
In 3D where you only have 20 to 30 targets you can get through the shots with minimal practice. But, with all the variance in targets getting through them is the best to hope for. Getting great at 3D means knowing the variance in target view at all the potential distance you will see for that target. It takes a lot of time and thousands of arrows to become excellent at finding those 12(ASA) or 11 (IBO) circles with an arrow.
If you are practicing a little bit for a few months out of the year you are not really ready for some 3D and you should plan on digging around for that lost arrow on the range at your next event. Still, it is fun to be out with your friends. Heck, consider golf. You can put in the same amount of effort only with golf you can drink beer with your buddies while you play.
I’ve got this webpage. I am guilty of being somewhat egotistical. I write about what I do. I write about coaching and sports research. I write about other stuff. I find it fun.
Some folks use social media as an ego outlet. That’s fine. I enjoy reading about what my friends are doing. I’ve got ‘real’ friends all over the globe. I keep in touch with them via email, calls, and Facebook.
Email and phone contact works when I can’t visit folks face to face. Facebook was once a decent method to keep up with friends. Then, it seemed to change. Facebook became a venue for commercials and political crap.
I’m not interested in the commercials. I care little about the half-truth political crap that ends up being floated around social media. I am still interested in keeping in touch with friends. But, Facebook is a rare source for information regarding them.
This morning I clicked onto Facebook to specifically see if an archery post I’ve been waiting for had arrived. It had not. What was on Facebook was a lot of posting of no interest to me.
There were three divisions of posts today: commercial, those by friends, or political. I counted 100 and categorized them. These posted ended up being 58% commercial marketing, 23% political marketing, and 19% post by firneds. Or 19% of the posts containing actual information by friends and 81% junk.
Shooting an Olympic recurve is demanding. Unlike a compound bow there is no let off when the archer reaches their draw length. The archer has to hold the poundage at full draw. Increasing poundage can be useful and finding an ideal limb weight takes time.
Adult beginners can typically begin and enjoy shooting a recurve bow at lower poundage. As they improve they’ll often want to increase their draw weight. Younger archers take time to develop and their draw weight increases as they mature.
Initially an adult who begins at 25 pounds may see a rapid changes in poundage. Many people can jump from 25 to 35 in 2 to 4 pound increments fairly fast. Fairly fast is months versus years. Even so there will be people more comfortable remaining at lower poundage for much longer if not indefinitely.
Higher poundage does have some advantage. At longer distances an arrow launched at 32 pounds will travel more slowly and with more arch than the same arrow launched at 42 pounds. (Yes, I know the spine is different for 32 versus 42 pounds – this is an example for illustration) The faster arrow and flatter trajectory is affected less by wind. With a higher weight many archers see an improved release.
Moving up in poundage is not simple. An increase from 28 pounds to 30 pounds may feel easy where moving from 40 to 42 can feel exponentially more difficult. If the archer shoots using a clicker the archer may notice the clicker is more difficult to trigger.
The clicker and anchor point are note solely impacted by the increase demand to draw to bow there is additional compressibility of the soft tissue between joints. When changing limb weight the archer may find their clicker needs a slight adjustment of a millimeter to a few millimeters.
If you are considering increasing the poundage of your limbs and shoot a couple of hundred arrows per day don’t stay at that same volume with you increase weight. Decease by half or more until you can control your bow. This will aid to maintain form and reduce the risk of an injury.
Switching from compound bow to Olympic recurve has been challenging. Seventeen months ago doesn’t seem so long a time. Lots of practice and training has been augmented by a degree of talent transfer. There remains a long way to go.
Over the last twelve months I competed in 11 tournaments. The bigger events were skipped because of the Covid. I won 10 of the 11 competitions. Of those I entered 4 were in the Masters division, either the 50 – 70 or 65 – 69.
There were mixed reasons for competing my age group. Most often it was because I hadn’t been able to practice at the distance of the younger division. I don’t have a 90-meter range and for a long time a downed tree blocked my 70-meter range. One other event I could only compete in my age group.
In the 6 tournaments where I competed against the younger division I won all but one where I took 3rd. That was the USA Archery Georgia State 18-Meter Indoor tournament. The others: Georgia NFAA Indoor, Georgia USAA Field, Georgia USAA Target, Georgia USAA 25-Meter Indoor and Southern Fall Shootout I won.
Over the course of the switch I’ve shot 43,730 arrows, broke a riser in two, increased poundage from 32 to 42 and added a clicker. I can attest it has been a lot of work.
Vacation is fun or so they say. However, it you are a competitive athlete time off can be tough.
It doesn’t matter what the sport is when athletes pause for recovery it can be difficult. There is a feeling that time is wasting and opponents are getting better while you are relaxing. That really isn’t the case. By that the case being that an opponent is getting better while the vacationing athlete is losing form. Breaks are necessary. It allows the body to recover and the mental stress to abate. Non-stop training leads to injury and burnout.
Too many breaks is another matter. Pretty much that means, when you are taking lots of breaks, you are an enthusiast. Being an enthusiast is fine. Most athletes fall into this class. The sport is more of a hobby. Some folks call these individuals weekend warriors. Again, this is the class of athlete that is the foundation of sport.
Top athletes are different. Not simply that they train differently often times they are genetically different. In football those professional athletes are bigger, faster stronger and have an ability to see rapidly moving patterns on a field. In baseball their speed and reflex ability is breathtaking. In archery the top athletes can shoot hundreds to thousands of arrows (weekly) without damaging shoulder joints and have a keen sense of feeling a target and loosing an arrow. All of those top athletes still need to plan for recovery.
Jerry Rice the greatest of all time at his position was not the most gifted player of that position. He did however plan specific times for recovery and had a very specific off-season training plan. Archery can be done year round. As archers, we really don’t have much of a down season. Once indoor season ends outdoor season begins.
This essentially non-stop sport requires scheduled period to recover. In your yearly training plan you do need to have select periods where you don’t pick up a bow. It is hard to do but it will help you recover and last as a competitive archer.
At the ACE Hardware archery range, in Social Circle, Georgia, where I was practicing I ran into a friend, Tim Simpson. Tim is a former Professional Golfer. He is, also, an archer. Tim shoots barebow. I shoot an Olympic recurve. We frequently have lots to talk about.
Yesterday was no different. We landed on a topic of training and partly recovery. Specifically, we were going over recovery methods that he and other professional golfers used.
Prior to winning the most medals in an Olympics a coach of Michael Phelps said, “Michael has been training the pool for ‘many’ years without a day off” – an incredibly long time. I don’t recall exactly the number of years. I do recall it seemed excessive. Then, some of those days in the pool my have been active recovery days. Either way that seemed like a lot of days without time off for recovery. It worked for Michael Phelps.
Tim shared with me what Jack Nicklaus had said to him about days off. According to Tim, Jack took a day off a week and sometimes two days in a row. After a longer series of tournaments he’d take week off and at times two weeks off. Makes sense to me. Tim asked me about my recovery days.
I told time I take at least one day off per week. Some weeks I’ll take two days off. After a long bit of competition and training I take a week or more off. These break times are built into my training cycles.
Since picking up a recurve bow I have been careful to avoid over doing it. From the start I scheduled recovery and limited my daily arrow count. As I felt stronger the arrow count increased, as did the bow poundage.
During the 471 days I’ve owned an Olympic recurve I shot it 343 days. The other 128 days were recovery days. That’s 27% of the days being planned recovery days. Over the days of actually shooting the bow I’ve shot 43,430 arrows. That is an average of 127 arrows per day. However, I don’t shoot 127 arrows per day. Some days there are a few as 70 and other days as many as 250. It depends on where I am in a training cycle. In 2022 the maximum number of arrow for one day will reach 300. It was tempting to go for that in 2021. But, I have a plan and am sticking with.
Crucial to being able to maintain a solid training cycle is recovery. Rest, recovery and sleep are critical to improvements of athletic ability. If you are injured or declining in performance due to over training you only hurt yourself in the long run.
Remember, this is especially true for archery, the greatest ability is availability.
Archery isn’t a sport requiring high level of cardiopulmonary fitness. It does require an elevated degree of neurocognition. Archery demands a physically repeated action that does stress upper body muscles and skeletal structure. It also necessitates the ability to balance with minimal sway placing additional demands on an athlete’s core and lower body support. Sleep reinforces sport recovery and improves performance.(1)
The disciple required to excel in sport is enormous. The daily activities during training, travel and competition all can decrease the ability to train properly, focus and compete.
Training along with poor restorative sleep can lead injury. Overtraining is associated with injury and lower performance levels. Sleep deprivation or poor sleep quality does reduce performance and leads to injury.
One of the easiest, albeit infrequently considered, ways to improve performances is understanding that quality sleep supports develop as an athlete. Then, taking the steps to improve sleep.
This is true for archery. In a convenient sample of training scores, simulated tournaments over 30 days sleep quality was recorded along with performance levels.
Nights where sleep was poor were documented, as were the higher quality sleep cycles. These were based on hours of sleep, good sleep being greater than seven hours, and poor sleep less than seven hours. (Personal data n=1)
The mean number of hours slept for a quality scores was 7.8 hours versus 6.3 hours for poor quality sleep. Those nights with better sleep yielded a mean score of (vertical 3 sport 18 or 25 meters Olympic recurve bow for both conditions) 549 versus 532, quality sleep vs. poor quality sleep, respectively. The difference of 17 points is significant (3.09%). A high score of 568 was achieved at both 18 and 25 meters for quality sleep nights. Those higher scores had a range of 568 to 540 points. The poor quality sleep had a high score of 540 (at 25 and 18 meters) and a low score of 527 (25 meters) was revealed.
Sleep has been shown to improve performance of skilled athletes. (2) In this data set archery is not an exception.
(1) Simpson NS, Gibbs EL, Metheson GO: Optimizing sleep to maximize performance: implications and recommendations for elite athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Mar; 27(3): 266-274