It didn’t seem like a wise use of money to fork out big bucks for high-end equipment when switching to an Olympic recurve from compound bows. (145 days ago) Why do that when the compound bows were in the $800.00 range purchased new. It wasn’t as if prior archery gear had been high-end.
When it came to high-end gear the nicest pieces of equipment associated with the compound bows had been the sight and release. Those were high quality Axcel/TruBall products.
The arrows shot using the compound bows had been purchased and prepared by folks that, at the time, seemed to know better. Two out of three times their suggestions were correct. For the remaining third the arrows are too stiff.
Some ‘expert’ on YouTube presented a video suggesting that spine calibration is a myth so long as the arrows shot are fletched. The video he posted was an experiment where he fired off sets of arrows of various spine strength using fletched and bare shaft arrows. He was shooting a recurve bow. I repeated his experiment. My results yielded an opposing result.
I’d hoped for similar results. I’ve got some nice arrows, those among the good 2/3 of my moderately priced arrows and wanted to upgrade the Easton 1000 arrows I’ve been shooting with the Olympic recurve. What I found is that the stiffer more expensive arrows didn’t bend properly and the tail end of those arrows hit my riser. The flex between nodes simply wasn’t flexing properly. I was hoping to save some money by avoiding the purchase of new arrows.
The Easton 1000s are excellent beginner’s arrows. I’ve won two State Championships using a $249.00 Olympic recurve in the Men’s Senior Division shooting those $5.00 arrows. However, I know the $5.00 arrows are holding me back when it comes to a few extra points. (For now there is nothing wrong with the inexpensive bow)
The tip of the Easton 1000s comes included along with fletching for the five bucks. The tip is 65 grain, which is okay. The fletching is a bit tall again okay for indoor tournaments. Okay is not great in competition. The set up does mean being just a hair off on form and the shot will be completely uncompensated. In words too often associated with archery gear – these arrows are not very forgiving.
Part of the lack of forgiveness is that the spine of an Easton 1000 peaks at around 29 pounds. As I’ve improved I’m pulling 34 pounds. On a 3-spot with the gear at hand I’m averaging 9 points per arrows without a clicker (I don’t have one yet). I believe with a stiffer spine and more weight on the tip I’d get my average per arrow up a little. The current fletching is dragging on my rest and that too can be improved by shooting a smaller profile vane.
If I cut the 1000s a bit that would stiffen the spine. But, adding a heavier pile weakens the spine. Changing the fletching isn’t an issue aside from I know it needs to be done and simply haven’t done it.
The best bet is to purchase new arrows with the correct spine, cut them to the correct length, add the correct pile weight to compensate for the cut and have low profile vanes.
Victory Archery, a maker of arrows, does have a moderately priced arrow that, per their spine calculators, meets the spec for my current shooting. Lancaster Archery does have them on clearance (the 2019 version). Even so, spine, nocks, vanes will still run around $250.00.
My estimate of points per arrows gain for the $250.00 investment is 0.18 points per arrow against a vertical 3-spot.* It seems like just a little but it really is a lot of gain. I just hate spending the money right now. (It also might help to adjust the tiller to positive versus neutral)
* calculation based on distance from center, 60 shots, measured in the yellow only. (45 our of 60 arrows. 15 red arrows attributed to form errors and dropped) Distance mean variance on average times spine weakness estimated percentage. (1.6 X 0.11 = 0.176 rounded up) 3-spot, outdoor, no wind – when it is windy all bets are off.